First I want to thank Josh Maher for sending me an invite and also Ariana O'Dell for offering one while I didn't yet know I had one from Josh.

I also want to say that I really enjoy reading Dave Winer's blog these days. He's not a prose stylist but he's an efficient communicator of interesting thoughts. He sees big context in small things, makes details tell, yet his style is spare and his syntax simple.

So he's been posting recently about Google+, and in one piece dismissively said this:

"Their [Google's] 'social' offerings have been rebuffed repeatedly, and they will continue to be rejected by users, no matter how promising they are, no matter what they are, different from Facebook, a Facebook clone, doesn't matter."

He gives two reasons for this permanent and inevitable state of affairs, the second of which is, "Everyone's watching."

This means that:

" . . . on Day One your service pretty much has to be feature-complete, and ready for hundreds of millions of users. Forget about corner-turns. Forget about dipping your big toe in to get a sense of the temperature. These are the advantages of the upstart, when they're starting."

Photo (1)Well, he may be right, but damn if the darn thing (Google+) doesn't do a lot of shit right out of the gate.

I was so excited at getting Josh's mail that I started playing with Google+ with my iPhone, rather than wait to get back to where I had left my Android phone. Right away it started throwing choices at me, like telling me where I happened to be and asking if it should locate the post I was about to write. Then it threw out dozens of names as suggested connections, and let me select from the list even as it kept refreshing it with new finds.

Google+ appears to be promising that you can gradate access/permissions/exposure by placing your peeps in different "circles." I hesitated at how to categorize some folks, but soon enough I saw I could create and name my own custom "circles" (take that, Facebook).

Screen shot 2011-06-30 at 12.52.36 AMWhen I got back to my Android phone, Google+ really knew me and added additional nuance to my control. Once the a couple apps from the Android Market were installed, Google+ was asking about automatically uploading photos as I take them and inviting me to initiate a "huddle" (those features are not on the iPhone).

But I imagine I'd still play the heck out of Google+ even as a web app on the iPhone. The experience on the iPhone is like other Google services on iOS: work fine; feel like the mobile setting of a web page rather than a native app; are missing the touches that supercharge the experience but yet get the job done.

The delight of Google+ will come first on the Android apps. (Apple's answer to be Twitter integration?)

blog comments powered by Disqus